Highland Council scrap plans for overnight motorhome ban in Sutherland
Highland Council has scrapped councillor plans to ban camper vans from overnight stays in car parks in Sutherland.
Councillors had been vocal on the impact anti-social behaviour and dumping of waste has had on local residents.
It means two Sutherland car parks will still welcome camper vans and motorhomes to stay the night.
ALSO READ:
Enforcement of the ban, forcing overnight visitors to move along, would have cost the council up to £41,000.
There are two Highland Council car parks, one in Durness and one in Golspie which will continue to allow overnight stays.
Both car parks lie on the NC500 route and host camper vans at a cost of £10 a night.
Overnight visitors could only park for one night and then were not allowed to return for 72 hours.
A map of council car parks under the council’s motorhome parking scheme – note the two sites in Durness and Golspie that were at risk of rejecting overnight visitors.
The ban was to cost up to £41k but Sutherland councillors believed this was a worthy cost.
Councillors referenced “inappropriate waste disposal” and “anti-social behaviour” from overnight visitors as reasons for bringing forward the ban.
The restriction was first discussed at a Sutherland committee meeting by east ward councillors Richard Gale and Jim McGillivray.
Top Stories
-
Less is more in East Sutherland Camera Club’s latest competition
-
YOUR VIEWS: SSEN’s pylon line consultation a tick box PR exercise; and one law for Inverness and another for Sutherland
-
MARK GILBERT: I enjoy a bet, but luckily I can walk away if I lose
-
PICTURES: 5 fascinating objects you can see on display at Tain Museum as part of its 2025 exhibits
Councillor Michael Baird previously said camper vans and motorhomes would have been directed to campsites with dedicated facilities.
Council officers had also stated said the ban could have “unintended consequences” by forcing motorhomes into other rural areas.
They said “displaced motorhomes” choosing to wild camp could have an “adverse impact” on biodiversity in the region.
Now, no further action will be taken following the ruling in the council chambers.